Subclass 190 NSW changes its process
February 4, 2015
Proposed Changes to Visas, Sponsorships and Nominations
March 18, 2015
Show all

Recent Immigration Legal Cases

Recent Australian Common Law: Immigration Legal Cases


Sapkota v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 160

Relying on Schedule 3 to apply for a visa within 28 days of your last visa expiring is an an exception. This exception to allow you to apply for a visa without holding a visa is only available once. Should a visa applicant not meet Schedule 3 criteria at the time of making an application, the visa will be refused.


 Minister  for Immigration v  Lee  & Ors [2014] FCCA 2881 (10 December 2014)

Applicants who have applied for the Migration Review Tribunal on a nomination refusal, do not have jurisdiction at the MRT to have the nomination or subclass 457 visa heard. Applicants only have jurisdiction at the MRT if:

1. the business sponsorship has been refused; OR

2. their subclass 457 has been refused


Mohammed v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 184 (6 March 2015)

An application is not a valid application until the Department receives the application. In this case, the applicant could not apply on line due to a “system error” and made a paper application the day after his visa expired. The Federal Court held that the delay means that a valid application is the only application that is acceptable when the application fee is paid.


1410214 [2015] MRTA 181 (4 February 2015)

Pregnancy is not a compelling and compassionate circumstance to waive Schedule 3. The compelling and compassionate circumstance must have existed prior to making the application, not developed after the lodgement of the visa application.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Translate »